Steam Is Being Sued — And Gamers Aren’t Buying It

A nearly $1B lawsuit over a platform gamers chose voluntarily

This one is peak clown world lah.

Steam — the one PC platform that actually works, actually respects users, and actually delivers value — is being sued for monopoly behavior.

Not a slap on the wrist either.

We’re talking up to roughly $1 billion USD in damages
(about £656 million in the UK case alone).

For what crime?

Being too good at its job.

---

A Billion-Dollar Lawsuit… For Competence?

Let that number sink in.

Nearly a billion dollars, not because Steam:

• locked users in

• forced exclusivity

• bricked your library

• scammed developers

But because it became the default choice.

That’s it. That’s the sin.

No one forced gamers onto Steam.
We walked in ourselves, sat down, and never left.

---

Steam Didn’t Trap Gamers — Gamers Chose Steam

Let’s be very clear, before the legal PowerPoints start flying.

Steam didn’t kidnap anyone.

We chose it because:

• The launcher works

• Refunds actually exist

• Sales are real sales

• Mods, reviews, forums all in one place

• Your library doesn’t randomly disappear

That’s not monopoly behavior.

That’s earning trust over 20+ years.

---

Compare Steam to the Rest (Be Honest)

Every PC gamer has tried the alternatives. Everyone.

Epic Games Store?
Free games, sure — launcher still feels beta after years.

Ubisoft Connect?
Random logouts. Server errors like it’s a feature.

EA App?
Origin with a new coat of paint. Same old headache.

Battle.net?
Fine… if Blizzard is your whole personality.

So when regulators ask:

“Why does Steam control so much market share?”

The answer is painfully simple:

Because everyone else keeps dropping the ball.

---

This Is the Only Industry Where Being Good Gets You Punished

If Steam were actually abusive, gamers would riot first.

We complain about:

• $10 price increases

• bad ports

• bad UI changes

You think we wouldn’t nuke Steam if it deserved it?

But instead, gamers are out here saying:

“Wait… Steam is the bad guy now?”

That should tell regulators everything.

Steam’s dominance isn’t built on force.
It’s built on reliability.

And reliability doesn’t show up nicely in antitrust spreadsheets.

---

The Real Motivation Behind the Lawsuit

Let’s not pretend this is about “protecting gamers.”

This is about:

• Publishers wanting lower platform cuts

• Competing stores wanting relevance

• Regulators uncomfortable with one clear winner

Instead of competing by being better, they went:

“Let’s sue him.”

Classic.

Steam sets the bar so high that everyone else looks lazy by comparison. And instead of climbing, they’re trying to drag it down.

---

If Steam Loses, Gamers Lose

Here’s the part that actually matters.

If Steam gets forced to:

• weaken its ecosystem

• fragment features

• artificially open what’s already optional

What do gamers get?

• More launchers

• More logins

• Worse UX

• Broken libraries

• Less consistency

All so regulators can say “competition increased” on paper.

Congratulations — everyone now suffers equally.

---

Steam Isn’t Perfect — But It Earned Its Spot

Is Steam flawless? No lah.

The cut is high.
Discovery still sucks for small devs.
Algorithms feel random.

But those are scale problems, not abuse problems.

Steam didn’t win by trapping users.
It won by not being a pain in the ass.

That’s a low bar — and somehow, still rare.

---

PokGai Reality Check

PC gamers didn’t stick with Steam because we’re dumb.

We stuck around because:

• It saves time

• It saves money

• It saves sanity

If that’s worth a $1B lawsuit, then maybe the problem isn’t Steam.

Maybe the problem is an industry where being competent makes you the villain.

That’s some next-level Pok Gai logic.

---

❓ FAQ

Q: How much is Steam being sued for?
A: The lawsuits target damages of up to around $1 billion USD, including a £656 million UK class action.

Q: Why is Steam being sued for monopoly?
A: Because it dominates PC game distribution by being widely preferred—not by forcing users or locking them in.

Q: Did Steam trap gamers into its platform?
A: No. Gamers can uninstall Steam anytime. They stay because it’s reliable and convenient.

Q: Is Steam anti-competitive?
A: Not in the traditional sense. Competing stores exist—they just struggle to match Steam’s features.

Q: Would breaking Steam up help gamers?
A: Unlikely. It would probably lead to worse experiences and more fragmentation.

Q: Why do gamers defend Steam?
A: Because compared to alternatives, Steam saves time, money, and frustration.